dance & aesthetics, mostly
Slip of the tongue
January 7, 2011Posted by on
A recent BBC article about the purchase of a work by Pieter Brueghel the Younger mistakenly referred to the painting as an “Old Master”. In art history jargon, the term “Old Master” refers to an artist, not to art works.
Does art history need to lose the jargon in order to remain relevant? Does art history want/need to remain relevant?